Most Reading
-
To be perfectly honest, its a tad unbecoming to hear a proposition of the likes of Pascal's Wager. If one is not familiar with this wage...
-
This is not means by which I attempt to boast a good deed. The call for an act that required me to go out of my way to help came about when ...
-
One of the most frequent questions I get in regards to my atheism is how I could justify my morals. Not that I can't be a moral person b...
-
"I know you're young but I wish you open your eyes to the truth" hovered over my ears, like innocuous, snow white clouds. For ...
General Theory of Nonexistence
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
a) The only god that can exist is nature.
b) Nature would not define itself as god, as it is an unconscious agent in the universe.
One may then reason that proving the nonexistence of any sentient god would be directly found at an injunction in which natural processes can explain our world. However, this will take copious amounts of time to find enough evidence to placate the stubborn and more so, could be potentially as unstable as our constantly changing understanding of the universe. The majority of the human population would not see new understanding as natural processes, but as divine intervention. So one may conclude, based of the myriad of interpretations of understandings of our universe that sway dangerously far from the objective observations of science that :
a) Human cognition demands an explanation almost always, and when it cannot find one it will consequently make one- that being god, the ultimate, infallible answer to just about everything.
b) Without the knowledge of natural processes, humans will invariably create their gods so as to avoid the discomfort of not knowing.
There are invariably thousands of explanations of people's personal gods. Each god is made in the patriarchies' image, and behaves as he does, or would like to. An age later, that god becomes part of the newer societies' literature, laughed at and studied deeply as that society commits to new, better gods. Consequently, we must treat these premises as such:
a) Every religion that has ever existed has had some insight into a divine god.
Therefore, every religion is correct.
(if gods are made in the image of man, then they cannot objective interpretations anyhow)?
If one is persuaded to agree to this proposition, then one may affirm that a divine god exists, whether or not evidence for him actually exists. Simply put, a person may believe a divine god exists because he or she understands every faith has had insight to it, and understood it as such- every religion is a language for the explanation of god, and does its best to say the same thing: god is real.
If however, an individual, employing their intellectual faculties, disagrees with the statement that each religion is correct then they must throw out the entire divinity of a god because:
b) If one does not believe each religion is a code for god,
then they must believe that religions before were stories and interpretations of events and things antithetical to their common logic.
-they must then acquiesce that their own religion is not a code of language for divinity.
Thus, a divine god does not exist. For all religions have been a petty, weak, and unsupported decoding of the god of nature. Science, lacking a dogmatic and rigid structure, gives us the natural processes to our world- making unsupported claims about the universe and divinity unnecessary and actually pernicious. Science is the antithesis to religion: it begins to explain the god of nature.
One may now cease to make religion out of interpretation of the divine, but make oneself divine out of interpretation.
Fallen Francis
Thursday, January 15, 2015
Breathing Life Into Rocks
Sunday, January 4, 2015
Wondering as a Wanderer Day I
Monday, December 29, 2014
It took a solid ten minutes, but I didn't let the fact that he smoked cigarettes bother me. I,after all, had given him the opportunity to eat well. I had given myself the opportunity to understand that he has shunned by his fellow neighbors. I understand that he has been shoved into the darkness, no candles to light the way. That cigarette may be his only light..
Or we can decide to pull him back.
My First Atheist Christmas Pt I
Wednesday, December 24, 2014
"I know you're young but I wish you open your eyes to the truth" hovered over my ears, like innocuous, snow white clouds. For a split second they floated and remained stagnant. Suddenly, the cloud became a doleful gray and began to hail, the lightning of the words struck my mind without discretion. The heat of the words seared my heart and caused me a bitter disposition for a couple minutes, which I must admit, as humbly as possible, I did a perfect job of hiding my scathing anger behind series of sarcastic utterances and a couple sardonic remarks. I hugged my father after wishing him the fortuitous events for 2015. It was time for prayer, so my sister and I knelt roughly four feet away from my parents and brother who grasped the bible with his whole self. They prayed an our father and hail mary in English, to the effect of their own voices, as my sister and I remained mute. My mother glanced at me once, she had to have expected this. This was my first christmas out of the closet as an atheist, I would no longer be bullied into doing things I felt were inane. They chanted some prayers in polish, to which effect I understood not. We finally got off our knees and onto our feet. As if by instinct I remarked, "That was shorter than last year." Father declared that I had no say because I hadn't participated in the prayer. So be it. That was a challenge I very openly accepted with open arms. Sure I was a tad vindictive. Sure, this was turning into a tv show drama.
I woke up on christmas eve to the banging of pots and smells of meats being cooked. The house was busily stirring, my mom was downstairs already prepping for the evening. She was accompanied by my father who swiftly left, to my understanding he left for the store. I asked if I could help at all, although my responsibilities mostly lay with the day prior's vacuuming, lawn-mowing, dusting, washing of dishes, sweeping, and a little more. Today would be rather uneventful, to my effect in which I found myself at a friend's house. I spent the next three hours honing my virtual house building skills and having lightly contentious conversations about many issues. Also, you did read that right- two ninteen year olds tried their skills at Minecraft. I found myself enthralled in the simple game, the both of us serendipitous engaged to the dynamics of destroying blocks of material, collecting them, and thus moving them somewhere else. With a light, secret groan, I biked back home. Again, I found myself with a chore to do and was left to my own escapades. This included reading an excerpt of The Origin of Species before I had to get dressed for dinner. I finally got the get up, boasting my new floral tie and calogne. I happened to be the last one to the table.
I was the last one to leave. After the aforementioned series of events and everyone was finished partaking the many numerous esculent treats, my mom asked me my plans for the new year. I will not bore you with such details, however we ended up on the conversation of death. My dad, of course, had something smart to chime in, enthusiastically informing me I will end up in one of two places, worthy mention of my mother asking me if I'm worried about my soul. I insinuated the lack of soul and proceeded to address my father, starting with "well dad this is a tad odd, but..." I then did a drum roll on the table and continued, rather nonchalantly, "there is nothing after. Kind of like sleep but you never wake up." My dad shot me an angry look, my brother left the table soon after, my parents rounded up dishes, and my sister left after we exchanged some words. I did not ask for this, they came with the debate to me, let that be known.
I washed the dishes, my hands left soft and a little prune like as a result of warm, soapy water. I ascended the stairs to my room, and was met by my father. He found it in himself to confront me about the bible I asked them to send to me. I told him I was studying it. He instructed me to read the footnotes, "then I'll understand."
I angrily remarked that he "needs to stop trying to convert me back." In swift response he replied that "[he] is my parent and concerned about [me]. It is [his] responsibility." I signaled him off with an ingratiating nod. I began writing this on my bed and finish on my phone, in the backseat of a civic headed to a sanctuary celebrating a fabled virgin birth.
This was my first Christmas dinner as an out of the closet atheist. I cannot wait to record my thoughts of my first Christmas mass as an out of the closet atheist.
Peace and happy holidays!
Giving Season
Tuesday, December 23, 2014
Likely, I never will. The American public is too skeptical of having a stranger off the street at their dinner table, and rightly so. The symbolism of the feast goes hand in hand with their religious beliefs, as they reflect on the year they've had as well as the year they are to have, before their attendance at a mass for the birth of their savior. To many of us, the 25th will be a holiday. It will not lead up to a great mass at midnight with choruses of singing. It will, however, lead up to an exchange of gifts.
It appears that material consumption has enveloped the 'season of giving.' One need not go far to hear the words of a mellow narrator for a car commercial inform one that it is that time to give and they've provided the perfect price for it. But how much giving do we need to give to those who we love? 365 days out of the year and the whole population deems themselves altruistic from one day of spending millions of dollars for each other? The equation for giving on christmas is easy. Whatever you do to one side you must do to the other. The equilibrium of one's wealth is typically stable as someone else provides them with a different solution, in a form of material gain, to placate their psychological discomfort. No, no one is really going. Everyone is going about consuming, forcing themselves into abjectly long lines; wasting myriad of hours finding things they aren't sure if the other party will like; unyieldingly scanning for new sales. It is such a mess of things. The new tradition has lobotomized the population into believing that buying for others is giving. We, as a whole, have indulged into ourselves far more than we should. Each year we provide each other with new gadgets and distractions to our lives at our table of plenty. These things know no warmth for our hands nor steam to our noses. We add more materials to our life, experimenting with each form to determine which yields the longest span of happiness. The public has forgotten to recognize their everyday attempts at giving to others, subverted by the climactic point in the economic year. Yet, they forget that satisfaction will be found when they can seat another at their table of plenty and share their goodness. A didactic lesson in academia; a selfless offer of a job; a simple exchange of words, especially to a stranger is arguably the most giving of one self.
This season I bought my mother and father a card, amounting to a grand total of 9$, and wrote to them words both of us cannot delete. A qwerty keyboard was not involved in the process. My pen in hand transcribed my heart to a card and will be there so long as they do not toss it or lose it. To my parents, I can give my heart. To a stranger, I can give my material. I can give them my time. To those with less than me, my genuine gesture of a gift card to a grocery store or fast food restaurant can make their holiday season. To a patient at St. Jude's, my donation of money I would've spent on superficial materials for my parents could make them smile for a lifetime. This year, I had limited resources but if the stranger cannot come to my feast, I shall go to his, or make him one. This giving season, I've given a little to those who I give every day of my life and given everything I can to those who didn't get a day of my consideration. I encourage the same to all of my peers.
Peace to all,
Patryk
Cheers to Pascal's Wager
Thursday, December 11, 2014
On the other hand, the forfeit of those intellectual faculties; the forfeit of deliberation on opposing ideas; and the forfeit of deviation from tradition produces such an abjectly obscene lack of empathy that we can longer treat it with an ingratiating pat on the back and a farewell goodbye. Religions fight over our souls; corporations over our dollar; politicians over our vote, and our brothers and sister seem to have taken a staunch and indifferent stance for tradition. One cannot criticize a person who cannot fathom the universe, but admits his lack of understand, and keeps his disposition to a pleasing and innocuous crossroads between his mind and tongue. This person's actions more or less are not influenced by pascal's in-existent god, but, by his own conventions. Waste not another gasp of breath on those who accept themselves humbled in nature, rather, save those breaths to condemn the actions of those who vie to take away breath of others in the name of their god. If one's intent is to teach children nonsensical myths in science class, criticize them. If one's intent is to make a profit off the fear for of losing infinite possessions, criticize them. If one's intent is to subjugate women to find favor with their god, criticize them. Let this be remembered: Doubt has and never should be grounds to commit thoroughly to any behaviors.